Yes. Everything you’ve heard is true. Flying on a United CRJ-200 is about as craptastic as it gets when it comes to commercial air travel.
The windows are so low that you’ll hurt your neck trying to see what’s happening outside. The seats are so narrow that you’ll be rubbing thighs with the person sitting next to you. The white plastic walls turned yellow 15 years ago, and touching any of the stains you encounter without being fully vaccinated is a recipe for disaster.
That said, there comes a point when it starts being cool to be an outcast. On a recent trip between Flint and Chicago, I discovered that the CRJ-200 just might be annoying (and disgusting) enough to be fun.
UA4805
Flint, MI (FNT) – Chicago, IL (ORD)
Monday, October 23, 2023
Aircraft: CRJ-200
Registration: N956SW
Duration: 51 minutes
Seat: 3D
My full review of the United Express CRJ-200 from Flint to Chicago
I’m no rookie when it comes to the CRJ-200. This 51-minute hop from FNT to ORD was my 47th flight on one of these little regional jets, and I’ve absolutely despised nearly every one of those experiences. But it’s 2023, this aircraft is getting on in years, and I’m starting to feel nostalgic. It’s amazing how a little nostalgia can make me say nice things about stuff I used to hate.
Arrival at the Flint Bishop International Airport (FNT)
Those of you who read my American Eagle ERJ 145 review already know how much I enjoy flying out of FNT. It’s a small (and efficient) airport, so arriving one full hour before boarding time will always be too soon.
I found it interesting that this particular aircraft (N956SW) was operated by Skywest. Flint seems to be awfully far east for an aircraft operated by a western regional carrier, so I’m not exactly sure how it ended up here. Perhaps it was being punished for something.
The boarding process
It was looking to be a very full flight in the moments leading up to the boarding process. The gate area was completely full (full of people not looking very excited about flying on a United CRJ-200 lol), and boarding was called precisely on time. I was on my way down the jet bridge within minutes.
The seats
Every seat on the United Express CRJ-200 is the same. There are no first class seats (or any with extra legroom for that matter). It’s all economy class in a 2-2 layout, and every seat sucks.
The departure
One of the other really nice things about flying out of Flint is that you’ll never have to wait for a departure slot. You’ll simply push off the gate, taxi out to the runway, and take off. No waiting.
In-flight entertainment
Trying to avoid rubbing thighs with the stranger sitting next to me did qualify as ‘in-flight entertainment’ I guess. I actually didn’t mind the fact that there was no Wi-Fi, and it wasn’t all that big of a deal that I wouldn’t be able to stream any movies or TV shows to my personal device. My full concentration was on avoiding thigh contact!
The food
Although my assumptions of no food being served on this flight were spot on, it should be noted that you might get a snack and a drink depending on the length of your flight. It’ll probably also depend on the mood of the flight attendant. This was a 51 minute flight to Chicago (and the flight attendant didn’t seem all that proactive), so we got zilch.
Seat comfort
10 years ago, trying to say nice things about the seats on the United Express CRJ-200 would’ve been impossible. I’m not sure how I didn’t notice it before now, but the leg room isn’t all that bad actually. Would you believe that it felt darn near as spacious as United 737-800 economy? The horror!
The descent (and arrival) into ORD
Approaching Chicago O’Hare from the east (over Lake Michigan) is always quite scenic. Especially if it’s sunny. I mean, just look at the pics…
Pros and cons of the United Express CRJ-200 experience
OK. Even though I’ve had a slight change of heart about this admittedly crappy little airplane, that doesn’t mean you need to go out of your way to fly on one. All I’m saying is that maybe it’s not as bad as everyone says it is.
Pros
The legroom is surprisingly spacious for an aircraft of this size.
Speaking of size, it’s small enough to be able to get on and off quickly (even if you’re seated in the last row).
Just read your account of the dreaded CRJ-100 and I second that motion. I call it the flying porta-potty. My experiences are similar. 1. MHT/ DTW had computer malfunction that gave me a bonus night in DTW. 2.LAX/SAN where all the lights shut down inside the cabin and at night it was total darkness flying in a tin can. 3. SYR/ORD (I think one of my first times in the beast) where the lav smell was so bad that the FA put a coffee packet on the coat hook inside the lav door that masked the putrid smell. 4. SFO/PSP where the turbulence was so bad coming over the mountain that I actually almost hit my head in the window seat against the wall. Wasn’t the plane’s fault except for it being so unstable and small. Had to brace myself from head injury
Haha, “flying porta-potty”! I’m just really glad that most airlines are in the process of getting rid of them and rebuilding their regional jet fleets with larger aircraft such as the E175/90. I hope never to fly on a CR2 ever again!
I’ve said before that I like the CRJ-700/-900/-1000 (they’re a but narrow, but the 2-2 configuration and large windows are great). However, the -200 is a whole different bird. It feels especially tight and the windows are way too low. I’ve heard that it’s objectively more cramped because the floor is higher than on its longer siblings.
It’s unfortunate that American is bringing back the CRJ-200 due to their contract with Air Wisconsin, while at the same time retiring their ERJ-145’s.
I know, it doesn’t get more “first world problem” than this. Lol
Yup, I can’t believe they are bringing them back! On the other hand, it’s been a while since I’ve been on a CRJ-200, and it might be fun to review the AA version of it. On a really short flight of course.
For whatever reason, I’ve seen a lot of SkyWest operating United Express flights out ORD over the years, to the extent I didn’t actually realize they were a western regional carrier until you mentioned it (I never even thought about the name, haha). With DAY as my home airport I’m no stranger to regional jets, but I’d gladly take a ERJ-145 over a CRJ-200 any day of the week, particularly if I can get that ERJ single seat. But I get what you’re saying about the nostalgia; while I don’t want to fly a CRJ-200 if I can avoid it, I’m also going to miss them when they’re gone, you know?
Yeah, the ERJ wins all day long with that sweet 1-2 configuration. I know I’d like the CRJ-200 a whole lot more if I didn’t have to sit thigh to thigh with complete strangers lol.
Anyway yeah, this flight reminded me of what I was feeling as the American Airlines MD-80 retirement drew near. I was never a fan of that thing – but it was definitely sad to see it go.
Wow! I wasn’t expecting this review to be that positive! I guess that legroom really did help. Anyway, my feelings on the CRJ-200 are the same as what I commented above, back when this article was still that SAN-LAX review.
That being said, as an avgeek, I really like the CRJ (even the -200). I love the look of it (it & the ERJ are the only remaining t-tail aircraft in “mainstream” airline service); the fact that you can board them by airstairs/ramp; sitting right by, looking at, and hearing the engine (sitting ahead of the wing for an extremely quiet ride is nice as well lol); and even its flying characteristics (takeoffs feel steeper and turns feel sharper on the CRJ, which can be fun. I even kinda, sorta like how turbulence-prone these things are. Basically, I like how you can “feel” the plane’s movements).
Oh, and random trivia regarding me and the CRJ: the rare CRJ-1000 is actually my most flown CRJ variant! Just wanted to point that out because I don’t think many people can say that lol.
I know, right? I used to really like these things too when they first came onto the scene, but that admiration didn’t last long. The nostalgia is finally hitting me though! The CRJ-200 is far from perfect, but I’m not afraid to admit that they’re a lot better than the old turboprops they replaced.
I agree – you may be the only person in the world who can claim to have flown on a CRJ-1000 the most (out of any other CRJ variant). How is that even possible?
Er…while the pilots may not be content with flying the CrappyRegionalJet-200 between Flint and Chicago, they certaintly won’t be able to launch a C-130 off an aircraft carrier. Aircraft carriers are only supposed to launch fighter jets, and the C-130 is too big (that’s what she said) and heavy.
Edit: Yes, I know a C-130 has done just that once or twice,but it was deemed unsafe and unpractical. Just thought you’d like to know a nerdy fact.
stevin henderson
Just read your account of the dreaded CRJ-100 and I second that motion. I call it the flying porta-potty. My experiences are similar. 1. MHT/ DTW had computer malfunction that gave me a bonus night in DTW. 2.LAX/SAN where all the lights shut down inside the cabin and at night it was total darkness flying in a tin can. 3. SYR/ORD (I think one of my first times in the beast) where the lav smell was so bad that the FA put a coffee packet on the coat hook inside the lav door that masked the putrid smell. 4. SFO/PSP where the turbulence was so bad coming over the mountain that I actually almost hit my head in the window seat against the wall. Wasn’t the plane’s fault except for it being so unstable and small. Had to brace myself from head injury
SANspotter
Haha, “flying porta-potty”! I’m just really glad that most airlines are in the process of getting rid of them and rebuilding their regional jet fleets with larger aircraft such as the E175/90. I hope never to fly on a CR2 ever again!
Albert
Hey, at least it was not a ERJ-120, then I had a feeling you would not even get on the plane.
SANspotter
Haha! Even as much as I enjoy flying, it IS hard to get on airplanes every now and then. Especially regional jets!
Peter
I’ve said before that I like the CRJ-700/-900/-1000 (they’re a but narrow, but the 2-2 configuration and large windows are great). However, the -200 is a whole different bird. It feels especially tight and the windows are way too low. I’ve heard that it’s objectively more cramped because the floor is higher than on its longer siblings.
It’s unfortunate that American is bringing back the CRJ-200 due to their contract with Air Wisconsin, while at the same time retiring their ERJ-145’s.
I know, it doesn’t get more “first world problem” than this. Lol
Scott (SANspotter)
Yup, I can’t believe they are bringing them back! On the other hand, it’s been a while since I’ve been on a CRJ-200, and it might be fun to review the AA version of it. On a really short flight of course.
Luca
Are you excited about UAs CRJ550s coming to FNT at some point? If they ever retire the CrapRJ200 lol.
Scott (SANspotter)
Not as excited as I would be about a 777-300ER, but yeah. Sounds like a nice upgrade!
Paul
For whatever reason, I’ve seen a lot of SkyWest operating United Express flights out ORD over the years, to the extent I didn’t actually realize they were a western regional carrier until you mentioned it (I never even thought about the name, haha). With DAY as my home airport I’m no stranger to regional jets, but I’d gladly take a ERJ-145 over a CRJ-200 any day of the week, particularly if I can get that ERJ single seat. But I get what you’re saying about the nostalgia; while I don’t want to fly a CRJ-200 if I can avoid it, I’m also going to miss them when they’re gone, you know?
Scott (SANspotter)
Yeah, the ERJ wins all day long with that sweet 1-2 configuration. I know I’d like the CRJ-200 a whole lot more if I didn’t have to sit thigh to thigh with complete strangers lol.
Anyway yeah, this flight reminded me of what I was feeling as the American Airlines MD-80 retirement drew near. I was never a fan of that thing – but it was definitely sad to see it go.
Peter
Wow! I wasn’t expecting this review to be that positive! I guess that legroom really did help. Anyway, my feelings on the CRJ-200 are the same as what I commented above, back when this article was still that SAN-LAX review.
That being said, as an avgeek, I really like the CRJ (even the -200). I love the look of it (it & the ERJ are the only remaining t-tail aircraft in “mainstream” airline service); the fact that you can board them by airstairs/ramp; sitting right by, looking at, and hearing the engine (sitting ahead of the wing for an extremely quiet ride is nice as well lol); and even its flying characteristics (takeoffs feel steeper and turns feel sharper on the CRJ, which can be fun. I even kinda, sorta like how turbulence-prone these things are. Basically, I like how you can “feel” the plane’s movements).
Oh, and random trivia regarding me and the CRJ: the rare CRJ-1000 is actually my most flown CRJ variant! Just wanted to point that out because I don’t think many people can say that lol.
Scott (SANspotter)
I know, right? I used to really like these things too when they first came onto the scene, but that admiration didn’t last long. The nostalgia is finally hitting me though! The CRJ-200 is far from perfect, but I’m not afraid to admit that they’re a lot better than the old turboprops they replaced.
I agree – you may be the only person in the world who can claim to have flown on a CRJ-1000 the most (out of any other CRJ variant). How is that even possible?
I don’t think I’ve ever seen one in person lol.
Michael
Er…while the pilots may not be content with flying the CrappyRegionalJet-200 between Flint and Chicago, they certaintly won’t be able to launch a C-130 off an aircraft carrier. Aircraft carriers are only supposed to launch fighter jets, and the C-130 is too big (that’s what she said) and heavy.
Edit: Yes, I know a C-130 has done just that once or twice,but it was deemed unsafe and unpractical. Just thought you’d like to know a nerdy fact.
Scott (SANspotter)
+100 points for the “that’s what she said” reference. Well played!